Loading…
One exact wording per page, the verdict it returns in each market, the provision that decides it, and the authorised wordings that pass instead. Every cell is re-derived from the live engine on each build.
“I cured my insomnia with this.”
No. A testimonial is held to the same standard as your own copy, and a cure claim is prohibited outright in all four markets, each under a different instrument. What changes the answer is the claim — not who says it.
“Clinically proven to reduce the appearance of fine lines.”
Not on the strength of the phrase. All four markets flag it, each under a different instrument, and none of them accepts the words as a substitute for the study. The fix is not a softer claim — it is describing the evidence you actually have.
“Supports heart health. This statement has not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.”
No. Adding the disclaimer is exactly the right fix in the US, and our check turns green on it. It moves nothing in the EU, the UK or Germany: there the wording has to be on an authorised register before you may use it at all, and no disclaimer puts it on a list.
“Lose 30 pounds in 30 days. Results not typical. Individual results may vary.”
No. In the US the 2023 Endorsement Guides withdrew that safe harbour, so the disclaimer now marks the problem instead of solving it. In the EU, the UK and Germany the claim underneath is prohibited outright: advertising a rate or an amount of weight loss is not allowed at all, disclaimed or not.
“Supports a healthy immune system.”
In the US, yes — with substantiation and the DSHEA disclaimer. In the EU and the UK, no: not in those words, and no amount of evidence changes that.