AngleVerdict reads an ad the way both gates read it: the platform's policy, which judges what your copy promises the reader, and the regulator's, which judges what it claims about the product. Before you spend, it names the phrase and the provision behind it. It's a working tool for operators, not a compliance department.
No more four-figure lessons. See the problem while it is still a draft, not after the account is gone.
Every finding comes with an approved rewrite that keeps the hook. You ship, not stall.
When enforcement shifts, we track the rule surface and flag what changed — so you know which live winners to re-check.
You reach the people who build the engine, not a support tier in front of them. We work in the same Slack workspaces our customers do, and bug reports and policy drift are triaged the same day. The fastest way to reach us is hello@angleverdict.com.
Most affiliate tooling is built around cloaking: the arms race of disguising creatives until detection catches up. AngleVerdict is the opposite product. It's a pre-flight check that flags the policy-tripping phrases before Meta sees them, so your live ad is one the scanner accepts on first read. Nothing to hide, nothing to lose when the cloak breaks.
Hide creatives from Meta's ad-scanner via cloaking pages.
When the cloak breaks, you find out at the account level, not the ad level.
Write creatives Meta's scanner approves on the first read.
Buy aged accounts + reroute traffic when the current set burns.
Costs compound: every burn cycle buys the next set of accounts.
Spend that budget on volume, not on replacement infrastructure.
Hide the claim. The cloaker is the product, and concealment is the point.
Hiding never fixes the claim. The same violation rides every next creative.
Every verdict cites the rule and ships the approved fix, so the next one clears too.
The structural reason: a cloaking product can't pivot to compliance without cancelling its own thesis. We can, because compliant scale is our thesis. That's why the comparison is settled before the first dollar of ad spend.
We don't publish competitor ban-rate claims. When we cite BM-ban data, it comes with an evidence trail you can audit, the same posture we ask Meta to apply to our customers.